Skip to content

feat: add ability to imperatively defining the mapping between input … #8

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 17, 2025

Conversation

CostaRegi
Copy link
Collaborator

feat: Adding imperative mapping

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 14, 2025

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

OpenSSF Scorecard

PackageVersionScoreDetails
pip/langchain-core 0.3.35 🟢 5.3
Details
CheckScoreReason
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Code-Review🟢 7Found 21/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
License🟢 10license file detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Branch-Protection🟢 3branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Packaging🟢 10packaging workflow detected
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Vulnerabilities⚠️ 012 existing vulnerabilities detected
pip/langgraph 0.2.72 UnknownUnknown
pip/pydantic 2.10.6 🟢 7.4
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 10all changesets reviewed
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 23 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
License🟢 10license file detected
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Fuzzing🟢 10project is fuzzed
Packaging🟢 10packaging workflow detected
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
pip/exceptiongroup 1.2.2 UnknownUnknown
pip/jsonpath-ng 1.7.0 🟢 5.2
Details
CheckScoreReason
Maintained🟢 109 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Code-Review🟢 5Found 11/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Security-Policy⚠️ 0security policy file not detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
License🟢 10license file detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Branch-Protection⚠️ 0branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
Vulnerabilities🟢 82 existing vulnerabilities detected
SAST🟢 8SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
pip/openai 1.63.0 🟢 6.2
Details
CheckScoreReason
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 22 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Code-Review⚠️ -1Found no human activity in the last 7 changesets
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
License🟢 10license file detected
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
pip/ply 3.11 UnknownUnknown
pip/tomli 2.2.1 🟢 5.7
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 3Found 7/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Maintained🟢 1012 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Security-Policy⚠️ 0security policy file not detected
License🟢 10license file detected
Fuzzing🟢 10project is fuzzed
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
Vulnerabilities🟢 91 existing vulnerabilities detected
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
pip/jsonpath-ng ^ 1.7.0 🟢 5.2
Details
CheckScoreReason
Maintained🟢 109 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Code-Review🟢 5Found 11/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Security-Policy⚠️ 0security policy file not detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
License🟢 10license file detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Branch-Protection⚠️ 0branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
Vulnerabilities🟢 82 existing vulnerabilities detected
SAST🟢 8SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
pip/pydantic ^ 2.10.6 🟢 7.4
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 10all changesets reviewed
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 23 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
License🟢 10license file detected
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Fuzzing🟢 10project is fuzzed
Packaging🟢 10packaging workflow detected
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Scanned Files

  • examples/requirements.txt
  • poetry.lock
  • pyproject.toml

@CostaRegi CostaRegi force-pushed the feat/mapping-deter branch 2 times, most recently from c29cf46 to d8ce1bb Compare February 14, 2025 16:31
@CostaRegi CostaRegi marked this pull request as ready for review February 14, 2025 16:31
@CostaRegi CostaRegi requested a review from jnapper7 as a code owner February 14, 2025 16:31
@jnapper7 jnapper7 merged commit c98ebdb into main Feb 17, 2025
2 checks passed
@jnapper7 jnapper7 deleted the feat/mapping-deter branch February 17, 2025 09:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants